{"id":112,"date":"2006-09-09T23:40:39","date_gmt":"2006-09-10T04:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/09\/nfl-week-1-picks\/"},"modified":"2006-09-09T23:40:39","modified_gmt":"2006-09-10T04:40:39","slug":"nfl-week-1-picks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/nfl-week-1-picks\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Week 1 Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sunday, 1:00<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Ravens @ Tampa Bay(3)<\/em><br \/>\nI&#x2019;ll believe in the Ravens&#x2019; offense when I see it. This should generally be low-scoring but I like the Bucs here.<\/p>\n<p><em>Saints @ Cleveland(3)<\/em><br \/>\nI see in my Yahoo! group that I picked New Orleans, but I can&#x2019;t remember why&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><em>Falcons @ Carolina(5)<\/em><br \/>\nI&#x2019;m a little sour on the Falcons this year. I think teams will play eight or nine in the box all the time, spy Vick, and try to make him beat them with his arm&#8211;the formula the Panthers used on them last year with great effect. So I&#x2019;ll give the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Seahawks(6) @ Detroit<\/em><br \/>\nDetroit is going to suck again this year. Even if the offense gets better, which won&#x2019;t happen overnight, their defense is still pathetic. Seattle all the way.<\/p>\n<p><em>Eagles(4.5) @ Houston<\/em><br \/>\nI think the Texans will be better this year, though that&#x2019;s not saying a lot. However, I also think the Eagles will be better, and there&#x2019;s no way the Texans keep this within a TD.<\/p>\n<p><em>Jest @ Tennessee(3)<\/em><br \/>\nI have no reason to think these won&#x2019;t be two of the worst teams in the NFL this year. That said, I see the Jest as possibly the worst. Give the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Broncos(3.5) @ St. Louis<\/em><br \/>\nEverything new for the Rams, and this is the Broncos team which ran up that gaudy record and knocked off the champs in the playoffs last year. That&#x2019;s enough for me, I&#x2019;ll take Denver.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bengals @ Kansas City(2.5)<\/em><br \/>\nI don&#x2019;t get this spread at all. KC lost two of the best O-line guys in the league, still have no defense, and the Bengals return basically everyone, including Palmer, who looked awesome in his return. I love getting points here.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bills @ New England(9)<\/em><br \/>\nMan, that&#x2019;s a truckload of points. That&#x2019;s just waaaay too many&#8230; oh, right, it&#x2019;s the Bills. Yeah, I&#x2019;m taking New England.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday, ~4:00<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Cowboys @ Jax(2.5)<\/em><br \/>\nSome people seem to like the Cowboys this year because of T.O. Whatever, Mr. Distraction has already messed up the team. I like the Jags at home.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bears(3.5) @ Green Bay<\/em><br \/>\nI would be unsurprised if the Packers never got past midfield in this game. Bears win 6-0 on two field goals, unless Jones just happens to break one off.<\/p>\n<p><em>Niners @ Arizona(7.5)<\/em><br \/>\nThe Cards are the glamour pick right now with Edge and the new stadium and all, and the Niners ache. However, that&#x2019;s too rich for my blood this early.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday NBC<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Colts(3.5) @ New Jersey Giants<\/em><br \/>\nThe Manning Bowl, of course. The difference? Sign me up for Team Tiki!<\/p>\n<p><strong>MNF<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Vikings @ Washington(4.5)<\/em><br \/>\nAgain, the Vikings may not cross midfield in this game. Not that I&#x2019;m enthralled with the Redskins offense, especially with Portis dinged up, but the Vikings on the road is just not my cup of tea.<\/p>\n<p><em>Chargers(3) @ Oakland<\/em><br \/>\nLet the Rivers Era begin. Look, the Raiders will just plain suck. Even if the Chargers aren&#x2019;t quite as good because of Rivers, IIRC, they completely decimated the Raiders twice last year, and I&#x2019;m not convinced the Raiders will be any better. Go Bolts!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sunday, 1:00 Ravens @ Tampa Bay(3) I&#x2019;ll believe in the Ravens&#x2019; offense when I see it. This should generally be low-scoring but I like the Bucs here. Saints @ Cleveland(3) I see in my Yahoo! group that I picked New Orleans, but I can&#x2019;t remember why&#8230; Falcons @ Carolina(5) I&#x2019;m a little sour on the &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/nfl-week-1-picks\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">NFL Week 1 Picks<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}