{"id":115,"date":"2006-09-15T16:21:18","date_gmt":"2006-09-15T21:21:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/15\/nfl-week-2-picks\/"},"modified":"2006-09-15T21:03:29","modified_gmt":"2006-09-16T02:03:29","slug":"nfl-week-2-picks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/nfl-week-2-picks\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Week 2 picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sunday, 1:00<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Raiders @ Baltimore(-12)<\/em><br \/>\nIf it&#x2019;s possible to look much worse than Oakland did last week, I&#x2019;m not sure how. The only reason it was watchable at all is that I hate the Raiders and so got some kind of perverse pleasure out of watching them suck. Oh, and the Ravens looked great last week. Overall, it&#x2019;s pretty scary when 12 doesn&#x2019;t even seem like that much in week 2. I wonder if the Ravens&#x2019; defense alone can cover the spread. Ouch.<\/p>\n<p><em>Saints @ Green Bay(+2)<\/em><br \/>\nI think the Packers are going to be a raging disaster all season. Favre gets so much slack from all the fawning media, and I can&#x2019;t figure out why. Yeah, sure, he was great once, but he&#x2019;s horrible now. Packers should have unloaded him.<\/p>\n<p><em>Texans @ Indy(-13.5)<\/em><br \/>\nI really wonder about the Colts&#x2019; ability to run the ball. I think the lack of ground game will hurt them this year at some point. The Texans, however, are not that point. I&#x2019;ve been trying very hard to drink the Mario Williams Kool-Aid but I just can&#x2019;t seem to quite swallow it down. sigh. On the other hand, it&#x2019;s not like I expect anyone else will beat the Colts in Indy, at least not until the (choke!) playoffs. Oh, yeah, give the points. <\/p>\n<p><em>Bills @ Miami(-6.5)<\/em><br \/>\nI was completely underwhelmed with the Dolphins last week, and the Bills might have some life. Probably not really, but they might at least stay in a few games this year. I&#x2019;ll take the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Panthers @ Minnesota(+1.5)<\/em><br \/>\nEven if Steve Smith plays, he&#x2019;s not going to be 100%. Look for the Vikings to run 40 times, mostly on the left side behind Hutchinson. I can&#x2019;t believe I&#x2019;m actually picking the Vikings. &lt;ducks lightning bolt&gt;<\/p>\n<p><em>Bucs @ Atlanta(-5.5)<\/em><br \/>\nDang, is there space on the Falcons bandwagon? Yes? One more? Thanks, guys, I&#x2019;ll take that last seat.<\/p>\n<p><em>Giants @ Philly(-3)<\/em><br \/>\nYes, the Eagles looked a lot better with McNabb healthy and with Stallworth and all that. People seem to forget that they played the NFL equivalent of a 1AA team last week. Sure, the G-Men didn&#x2019;t exactly look like worldbeaters against the Colts, but that was the Colts, who are a heck of a lot better than Houston (see above). I will happily take the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Lions @ Chicago(-8.5)<\/em><br \/>\nDid you hear the nonsense from the Lions&#x2019; WR guaranteeing a victory? WTF? I expect the Bears to simply pummel Detroit here. I&#x2019;d give 10, 12, easy.<\/p>\n<p><em>Browns @ Cinci(-10)<\/em><br \/>\nThe Bengals are good. The Browns&#8230; aren&#x2019;t. Seems straightforward, although ten is kind of a lot, I think the Bengals should be able to do it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday, ~4:10<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Rams @ San Francisco(+3)<\/em><br \/>\nI&#x2019;m somewhat surprised that the spread isn&#x2019;t more, but then again, the Rams didn&#x2019;t get in the end zone at all last week. I guess I&#x2019;ll take St. Louis.<\/p>\n<p><em>Cardinals @ Seattle(-7)<\/em><br \/>\nLook, if you need a last-second field goal to beat the Lions and don&#x2019;t break double digits, there&#x2019;s a problem. I&#x2019;m taking the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Chiefs @ Denver(-10.5)<\/em><br \/>\nYes, Trent Green is out. But that&#x2019;s a boatload of points to be giving for a team lead by Jake the Mistake. If I were Plummer&#x2019;s insurance agent, I&#x2019;d double his rates&#x2014;I mean really, how long until some rabid Broncos fan tries to take him out to get Cutler the job? I&#x2019;ll take the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Patriots @ New Jersey Jets(+6)<\/em><br \/>\nYes, they get to be the &#x201c;Jets&#x201d; this week because they won last week. I&#x2019;m picking them to go back to being the Jest next week, though.<\/p>\n<p><em>Titans @ San Diego(-11.5)<\/em><br \/>\nMethinks the Chargers might be miffed at missing the playoffs last year. I thought they did a good job of not asking Rivers to do too much, and I don&#x2019;t see the Titans as being radically better than the Raiders, so I think the Bolts can cover this.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday NBC<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Redskins @ Dallas(-6)<\/em><br \/>\nWheee, the finger-pointing has already started, and people are already calling for Bledsoe&#x2019;s head. What&#x2019;s the over\/under on T.O. throwing Bledsoe under the bus? And the Skins looked kind of discombobulated last week, too. So much for the NFC East being all that. I hear Portis is supposed to be out, though, so I believe I have to give the points.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MNF<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Steelers @ Jax(+1.5)<\/em><br \/>\nGood matchup. I wish I knew if Big Ben or Batch were starting. Yes, Batch looked good last week, but this is Charlie Batch we&#x2019;re talking about here. If I knew Big Ben were starting, I&#x2019;d take the Stillers for sure. Grr, OK, I&#x2019;ll take &#x2018;em anyway.<\/p>\n<p>Last week&#x2019;s record: 7-9. Like anyone picked the Lions, though, sheesh, you can&#x2019;t blame me for that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sunday, 1:00 Raiders @ Baltimore(-12) If it&#x2019;s possible to look much worse than Oakland did last week, I&#x2019;m not sure how. The only reason it was watchable at all is that I hate the Raiders and so got some kind of perverse pleasure out of watching them suck. Oh, and the Ravens looked great last &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2006\/09\/nfl-week-2-picks\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">NFL Week 2 picks<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}