{"id":314,"date":"2009-11-14T23:05:09","date_gmt":"2009-11-15T04:05:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2009\/11\/14\/nfl-week-10-picks-4\/"},"modified":"2009-11-14T23:05:09","modified_gmt":"2009-11-15T04:05:09","slug":"nfl-week-10-picks-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2009\/11\/nfl-week-10-picks-4\/","title":{"rendered":"NFL Week 10 Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gotta do this fast, I\u2019m on the road&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Thursday 8pm<\/strong><br \/>\nBears at Niners (-3)<br \/>\nWe did this one by email, I thought the Bears were reeling and would look awful&#8230; and I was right.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday 1pm<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Falcons at Panthers (+1.5)<\/em><br \/>\nI don\u2019t get this. The Falcons are good and the Panthers&#8230; aren\u2019t. Seems like the spread should be like 5 or 6 here. Atlanta.<\/p>\n<p><em>Buccaneers at Dolphins (-10)<\/em><br \/>\nHow bad are the Bucs? Pretty awful. But ten sure is a big number&#8230; but the Bucs defense is awful, I\u2019ll give the ten.<\/p>\n<p><em>Lions at Vikings (-16.5)<\/em><br \/>\nWow, that\u2019s a lot of points. Vikings are looking good, though, and the Lions lost to the Rams at home in recent memory.  I\u2019ll go with Minny.<\/p>\n<p><em>Jaguars at Jets (-7)<\/em><br \/>\nI expect the Jets to win, but that\u2019s too many points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bengals at Steelers (-7)<\/em><br \/>\nWAAAY too many points. Cinci might even win this game. I\u2019ll take the Bengals.<\/p>\n<p><em>Saints at Rams (+14)<\/em><br \/>\nNew Orleans by double this, maybe 28-0 at halftime.<\/p>\n<p><em>Bills at Titans (-8)<\/em><br \/>\nYes, the Titans are playing a lot better, but 8? Seems a little extreme, I\u2019ll take the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Broncos at Redskins (+3.5)<\/em><br \/>\nWashington is horrific, I\u2019m going with Denver.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sunday ~4:10pm<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Chiefs at Raiders (-2)<\/em><br \/>\nRaiders have been awful, Chefs have been awful, this is a wash. However, the spread is less than three for the home team, so I\u2019ll give the points.<\/p>\n<p><em>Seahawks at Cardinals (-9)<\/em><br \/>\nArizona has been playing well lately, and Seattle is kind of all over the place. I don\u2019t think the Seabags can really cover the Cards\u2019 receivers, and Warner has been playing well, so I think the Cards cover this.<\/p>\n<p><em>Cowboys at Packers (+3)<\/em><br \/>\nPackers are fading, Cowboys are surging, gotta take Dallas here, as much as it pains me.<\/p>\n<p><em>Eagles at Chargers (-1)<\/em><br \/>\nI hate both of these teams in that they\u2019re both wildly inconsistent. The Chargers aren\u2019t very good against the run but the Eagles don\u2019t run. Horrible game to pick. Chargers?<\/p>\n<p><strong>SNF<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Patriots at Colts (-2.5)<\/em><br \/>\nThe Colts have been having to eek out close games the last couple weeks and the Pats have been hitting their stride. This is the big test. I like the Pats here.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MNF<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>Ravens at Browns (+11)<\/em><br \/>\nYes, it\u2019s a lot of points, but this is the Browns we\u2019re talking about. Might be the worst TV ratings for MNF all year. Easily give the points in what should be a laugher.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gotta do this fast, I\u2019m on the road&#8230; Thursday 8pm Bears at Niners (-3) We did this one by email, I thought the Bears were reeling and would look awful&#8230; and I was right. Sunday 1pm Falcons at Panthers (+1.5) I don\u2019t get this. The Falcons are good and the Panthers&#8230; aren\u2019t. Seems like the &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2009\/11\/nfl-week-10-picks-4\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">NFL Week 10 Picks<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[16],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}