{"id":429,"date":"2011-01-15T23:01:22","date_gmt":"2011-01-16T04:01:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2011\/01\/15\/a-standard-deck-sin-city\/"},"modified":"2011-01-15T23:03:42","modified_gmt":"2011-01-16T04:03:42","slug":"a-standard-deck-sin-city","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2011\/01\/a-standard-deck-sin-city\/","title":{"rendered":"A Standard Deck: Sin City"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s late in the rotation and a new set is about to come in, and people are complaining that Standard is getting stale. So, here\u2019s something new to try.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ll be the first to admit that I\u2019m not much of an original deckbuilder. However, every once in a while I have an idea that I think is worth at least exploring. Yesterday as I was doing errands before FNM, an idea struck me and I thought it was worthy enough to hastily try to throw it together and give it a spin. Unfortunately, FNM didn\u2019t happen last night since not enough people showed. I did get to play the deck a few times against what I think is actually a pretty good Metalcraft aggro deck. I was worried that the deck would be soft to aggro in Game 1 and it didn\u2019t seem bad at all.<\/p>\n<p>The deck name is obviously drawn from the color combo: black and white with a splash of red. Here\u2019s the list:<\/p>\n<p>[deck title=Sin City]<br \/>\n[Creatures]<br \/>\n4 Wall of Omens<br \/>\n4 Emeria Angel<br \/>\n2 Wurmcoil Engine<br \/>\n1 Grave Titan<br \/>\n1 Admonition Angel<br \/>\n2 Sun Titan<br \/>\n[\/Creatures]<br \/>\n[Planeswalkers]<br \/>\n3 Gideon Jura<br \/>\n[\/Planeswalkers]<br \/>\n[Other spells]<br \/>\n3 Everflowing Chalice<br \/>\n4 Lightning Bolt<br \/>\n2 Luminarch Ascension<br \/>\n4 Inquisition of Kozilek<br \/>\n3 Doom Blade<br \/>\n2 Mimic Vat<br \/>\n[\/Other spells]<br \/>\n[Land]<br \/>\n3 Tectonic Edge<br \/>\n4 Marsh Flats<br \/>\n4 Arid Mesa<br \/>\n5 Plains<br \/>\n3 Swamp<br \/>\n2 Mountain<br \/>\n3 Lavaclaw Reaches<br \/>\n1 Blackcleave Cliffs<br \/>\n[\/Land]<br \/>\n[Sideboard]<br \/>\n4 Duress<br \/>\n2 Luminarch Ascension<br \/>\n2 Pyroclasm<br \/>\n3 Baneslayer Angel<br \/>\n1 Sunblast Angel<br \/>\n2 Day of Judgment<br \/>\n1 Liliana Vess<br \/>\n[\/Sideboard]<br \/>\n[\/deck]<\/p>\n<p>The deck was actually inspired, in a weird way, by Mike Flores\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/magic.tcgplayer.com\/db\/article.asp?ID=9289\" target=\"_blank\">Mythic Titan<\/a> deck and the point he made about <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Luminarch Ascension\" target=\"_blank\">Luminarch Ascension<\/a> and then some other thoughts I had about changes to that deck I was going to make. In particular, I wanted to add <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Wurmcoil Engine\" target=\"_blank\">Wurmcoil Engine<\/a> (because it\u2019s amazing) and the \u201cother white Titan,\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Admonition Angel\" target=\"_blank\">Admonition Angel<\/a>, to take advantage of all the land the deck generates. Then I realized that <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Emeria Angel\" target=\"_blank\">Emeria Angel<\/a> would be good there as well, and then it occurred to me that many of those effects would be fine off fetchlands. @dcampa93 on Twitter suggested going more control and adding <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Wall of Omens\" target=\"_blank\">Wall of Omens<\/a> somewhere, and that made me think about Pyroclasm as a mass removal option in lieu of (or in addition to) Day, and I realized I wanted to try something that doesn\u2019t use the Jace-Cobra-Preordain-Mana Leak basis that makes Flores\u2019s deck in some way just the Bant variant of BUG and RUG.<\/p>\n<p>Once I decided on the color combination, and realized I\u2019d be running eight fetches, I really wanted <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Emeria Angel\" target=\"_blank\">Emeria Angel<\/a>. There have been some interesting discussions out there about using her in UW control decks as a way to protect Planeswalkers, but I think she\u2019s actually pretty good even without a large number of Planeswalkers.<\/p>\n<p>The other card I really wanted was <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Mimic Vat\" target=\"_blank\">Mimic Vat<\/a>. I think this card is incredibly underrated, or maybe just underplayed. It makes your own removal better, can blank opposing removal, and is simply nuts with creatures that have ETB effects. It\u2019s also amazing with a Wurmcoil on the table.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, Sin City plays like a control deck but one that can turn aggro very quickly. Gideon is key to this ability, and the other thing I\u2019ve noticed about the current environment is that it is, in general, light on fliers. The titans are all ground-pounders, and even most of the aggro decks are pretty much all on the ground. Bird tokens are great blockers but also can go aggro very effectively. <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Lavaclaw Reaches\" target=\"_blank\">Lavaclaw Reaches<\/a> is also really aggressive in the late game if you can get their board clear or get all blockers tapped via Gideon, and of course you can finish with <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Lightning Bolt\" target=\"_blank\">Lightning Bolt<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The sideboard is also really important. Against control decks, the other two <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Luminarch Ascensions\" target=\"_blank\">Luminarch Ascensions<\/a> come in with all four <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Duress\" target=\"_blank\">Duress<\/a>es and Liliana. This gives you 8 cheap hand kill, 1 expensive but recurrent hand kill, and 4 Ascensions, which certainly seems like it should be good. And even if they can kill and Ascension, you can possibly get it back with <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Sun Titan\" target=\"_blank\">Sun Titan<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>Against aggro decks, you obviously take out the Ascensions and bring in the Baneslayers and Sunblast (Sunblast is great with Gideon) as well as the <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Pyroclasm\" target=\"_blank\">Pyroclasm<\/a>s and the two <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Day of Judgment\" target=\"_blank\">Day of Judgment<\/a>. You end up with a lot of lifelink with the Baneslayers and the Wurmcoils which should give you a lot of extra clock. What else you take out would depend on the matchup. <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Emeria Angel\" target=\"_blank\">Emeria Angel<\/a>s aren\u2019t very good against decks running Bolt, but they don\u2019t die to <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Disfigure\" target=\"_blank\">Disfigure<\/a>, so that\u2019s at least something. Regardless, the two Days, two Pyroclasms, and all the lifelink makes you hard for aggro decks to kill. <\/p>\n<p>(B\/R)UG is probably one of the tougher matchups. Pyroclasm is great against the Cobras and Oracles but you only have two, and that\u2019s not in game 1. I need to test more against this matchup; it might be the case that something like <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Sword of Body and Mind\" target=\"_blank\">Sword of Body and Mind<\/a> is called for in the sideboard. The good news is that <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Inquisition of Kozilek\" target=\"_blank\">Inquisition of Kozilek<\/a> kills <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Lotus Cobra\" target=\"_blank\">Lotus Cobra<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Explore\" target=\"_blank\">Explore<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Mana Leak\" target=\"_blank\">Mana Leak<\/a>, which is pretty good. Unless they run <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Acidic Slime\" target=\"_blank\">Acidic Slime<\/a> main (unfortunately, some do), they most likely won\u2019t have an answer to <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Mimic Vat\" target=\"_blank\">Mimic Vat<\/a> in game 1 and that can be a game-swinger but again, you only have two.<\/p>\n<p>In general against anybody playing Blue I\u2019m thinking keep in all the Bolts as an answer to Jace. You want all 8 hand disruption cards not only to keep them off things like Jace and <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Mana Leak\" target=\"_blank\">Mana Leak<\/a>, but to make sure you know when they have permission so you can safely cast your big guns. <\/p>\n<p>There are a few things that definitely merit further consideration:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Act of Treason\" target=\"_blank\">Act of Treason<\/a>. It certainly seems really good right now against some decks and Sin City runs the right color, but I\u2019m not sure what to take out to run one or two copies. Except maybe:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 I\u2019m not 100% sure that I\u2019m sold on <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Grave Titan\" target=\"_blank\">Grave Titan<\/a> in this deck. Is that the card to cut for an <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Act of Treason\" target=\"_blank\">Act of Treason<\/a> or a second <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Admonition Angel\" target=\"_blank\">Admonition Angel<\/a> or perhaps another removal spell?<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 The mana base might not be quite right. Three <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Tectonic Edge\" target=\"_blank\">Tectonic Edge<\/a>s seems like the right number, particularly since they can be recurred with Sun Titan; but because of the Titans perhaps even two would be OK. It\u2019s great to have eight fetches, too but maybe there\u2019s something else that would be good.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Is there a call for <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Oust\" target=\"_blank\">Oust<\/a> or <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Journey to Nowhere\" target=\"_blank\">Journey to Nowhere<\/a>? Bolts and <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Doom Blade\" target=\"_blank\">Doom Blade<\/a>s seem pretty good, but they don\u2019t handle indestructibles or produce great results vs. things like <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Wurmcoil Engine\" target=\"_blank\">Wurmcoil Engine<\/a>, and of course neither one really handles <a href=\"http:\/\/gatherer.wizards.com\/Pages\/Card\/Details.aspx?name=Grave Titan\" target=\"_blank\">Grave Titan<\/a>, either. <\/p>\n<p>Maybe it\u2019s awful, but it seems at least feasible in concept and of course, you can build it without $300+ worth of Jace. It\u2019s not as cheap as Boros and Vampires, of course, but if you want to play something other than aggro without Jace, maybe some version of this is an option for the next couple weeks.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019d love to get feedback! Comment here or hit me up on Twitter, @<a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/SunByrne\" target=\"_blank\">SunByrne<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s late in the rotation and a new set is about to come in, and people are complaining that Standard is getting stale. So, here\u2019s something new to try. I\u2019ll be the first to admit that I\u2019m not much of an original deckbuilder. However, every once in a while I have an idea that I &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/2011\/01\/a-standard-deck-sin-city\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A Standard Deck: Sin City<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[14],"tags":[15],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=429"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":431,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429\/revisions\/431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/byrneweb.com\/sunburn\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}